Context and Content: Manifest Universe

What follows is the raw text interpretation output of a ‘download’ received 28/11/2012

Context:

State space, field of potentiality, featureless, receptive, fundamental essence. Can be understood as “source as ground” which is fundamental and ubiquitous to all that is. Is pre requisite for arising of:

Information, defined as discernible difference, arising as initial instance of information process. Occurring within and as information space.

Information actualises in information space as LIVE, running iterative instances of multiple varieties of interactions of differences, and as structure of information space itself. Yes, the whole context is a living being.

All this arising anterior to perception and prior to the arising of the notion of the passing of time (microgenesis of the cognitive occasion ref. Jason Brown)

Experiential context is underpinned and rendered/animated by minimum requisite complexity arising from the field of potential as possibility.

 

sentience

sentience (Photo credit: undergroundbastard)

Content:

Awareness in self-reflection through sensoria is first instance of experience – first feedback loop returns information to the structure in a form it can engage with/or not. All particulars are manifest within this context. Sentient beings are instances of a particular class of entity.
Once awareness is connected, attention can arise, be drawn, held and directed, is available to be applied. At this point arises the pure, raw potential for intelligence, which is neutral. Intelligence is self-aware sentience gradually being realised and actualised.

Attention to objective is intention.

Intention can be influenced, disciplined, directed, crafted and applied. Attention can be drawn, in ways that influence focus of intention, before self-reflexive consciousness arises. Applied attention to the nature of the attractor can reveal aspects of the predisposition of the sentient entity, to itself through self-reflection, or to an observational entity.

Choice is fundamental and often based upon enactment of preconditioning of subconscious rather than present awareness. Focussed intention toward development of capacities which engender “gnosis” or direct knowing of the nature of the situation in which it appears we find ourselves, and our experience of it, is voluntary yet not optional for most effective interactive outcomes.

Realising that there are many ways one can become motivated, captivated, inspired, driven, devoted and disciplined, over the complex variety of manifest possibilities – the question arises as to what compels, or is likely to be a sufficient attractor for, this path/course/journey to be chosen and committed to by a diverse group of potential participants?

At the point where a practice commitment to said self-exploration, discovery and development methods is the conscious choice and enactment of free will of the individual, the inquiry as to what is required can begin. There is much to master, much of which is unavailable as an option until certain “undergraduate” fundamentals are embodied and enacted. A primary requirement is a willingness to know “the self” (which is the same self in every one, a common sense of being existent).

This is the process of sentience actualising itself, as experience of itself, as and through all beings simultaneously. Present sentient awareness knows itself as that which is being given rise to, in the context of the possibility for complex universal phenomenological manifestation.

The passing of time appears to the observational intelligence as a result of records of qualitative state changes, held in memory at various scales and resolutions, and made available to reflective recall, in the conscious and subconscious aspects of the sentient entity. These records of previous experience combine to establish the parameters of the ensuing possible range of experiences.

The corporeal aspect of the embodied entity is provided with multi-channel, signal analysis enabled sensor networks. It is able to attain stable manifest phenomena as it’s experience and appearance due to the attractor of subtle fluid, dynamic, interactive, energetic structures which are encoded specifically to render said experience. Realisation of the complexity and capacity of this aspect of manifest arising as our experience is one of the outcomes of commitment to a practice path.

Once these realisations are stable and actively engaged, the intelligent sentient entity can begin a practice of inquiry (into the nature of the relations between the multiple instances of combinatory possibilities in various interactive agentic entities, and the contextual underpinning of their very possibility). The processual field of potential is engaged directly as an act of agentic will. Combined/networked/focussed meta-agents can exert “pull” on the structure of the state space. The particular structural qualities of these meta-agents, generate pull dynamics which influence/constrain the field of possibilities.

 

 

 

Enhanced by Zemanta

2 Comments

  1. Right on. These ripening insights could lend to the development of a higher-order neural network in which meta-agents can better coordinate the pull upon sub-level networks and agentic entities that could use the requisite grounding to the point of inquiry. It may not even be “pull” so much as helping those networks let go and be drawn through the multifarious paths toward “the self” which they’ve been gifted.

    Also, the key realization you made concerned the “WE” should be noted, especially since it is the essential aspect of sentience actualising itself. Becoming the WE could be a potentially daunting task involving a considerable amount of sensors which would quantify the impacts of human engagement along their paths, but it’s by no means impossible, given the accelerating assistance from the meta-agents.

    From what you’ve told me, the Global Consciousness Project has made the preliminary discoveries we need, which means there is reason to justify a participatory consciousness involving sensors. I’m also reminded of the findings of Dr. William A. Tiller concerning the power of human intention to raise local symmetry in the substratum of space. Wild!

    Like

    Reply

  2. from a comment thread in FB, Trish Nowland noted that in some sense it seems that “consciousness sits differently in corporeality than it does in embodiment” – this insight bears further investigation.

    Like

    Reply

your thoughts?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s